Is this movie really that bad per people???

[Yash]

I still remember the first time I saw Humshakals, I laughed my head off. Seeing this rating makes me wonder if my humour is broken. Comedy films normally sit at 6-7 because humour is subjective, but a 1.8 rating just feels insane to me.

[Madhuri]

Bhai, I laughed a lot when I first saw it, but I had no idea.

[Imran]

Just pure time-pass.

[Ishita]

It was ahead of its time.

[Ashok]

I liked it and had a good laugh, but I was very young then. It's not that bad.

[Gaurav]

It was unbearable, especially when you compare it to the quality of Bollywood comedies back then.

[Varunesh]

Not really, IMDb isn't a reliable gauge. I don't agree with the 1.8 rating - it's way too high for this film. Ideally it should be around 0.5.

[Naveen]

I watched it as a kid and loved it then; I have no idea how it feels now. I'd suggest watching it as brain-rot, with the brain switched off and no logic expected.

[Manisha]

By the comedy standards of that era it was atrocious, but by today's standards it comes across as hilarious.

[Aman]

It's pure brain-rot. The director, actors and producers all knew it; nobody set out to make world-class cinema. If you watch it as brain-rot, you might find some laughs. So it definitely shouldn't be a 1.8; it should be higher. Pure brain-rot comedy that works are TMK and Phonebhoot.

[Vinod]

Cocaine ke parathe...