Bhanwar Singh Shekhawat's character: good potential, bad execution

[Deepika]

The character showed great potential to be a compelling grey character - he was corrupt yet stood against a goon corrupting the whole system. But in the second part they turned him into a clown, ruining both the character and the actor. It's sad to watch his character.

[Khushi]

Rule no 49: In Sir's movie, only Sir will shine and nobody else.

[Nandini]

His character dropped from 100 to 0 in no time. That's a real head-scratcher from Sukumar.

[Anita]

In the second part, they really messed it up.

[Jasmin]

Didn't Fahadh have a disagreement about the script for the second part?

[Kalpana]

It's not about execution; the problem lies in the writing.

[Dev]

I'm pretty sure they did that so he wouldn't outshine AA in the sequel, since he already surprised everyone in the first film with just 30 minutes of screen time.

[Ehsan]

Hell yeah... when the first part's climax hit, we all went wow and were pumped to see what he'd do next, but because the film is hero-centric they ended up doing a character assassination. Buggers!

[Shivendra]

Part-2 was so bad, I don't get why it made 1200 crores.

[Tanuja]

I think Banwar exceeded what Sukumar expected, and to keep his character from overpowering Pushpa, they deliberately ruined Banwar in Pushpa 2.

[Gregg]

The ending shown in part 1 set up part 2 the best they could. They had a chance for a Batman-vs-Joker style rivalry, but they blew it badly because of star power.