For context, the interviewer asked what you would do if you saw a woman being raped by a 6'4" jacked guy while you have a sidearm, and the man is standing behind the woman with only his head visible. He replied that he would shoot the man in the head, even though that could get him suspended, because a woman's dignity matters more.
(https://i.ibb.co/KpDmqGyR/gyzk639d1byg1.jpg)
No, it's a lie involving six people.
Or you could fire a warning shot, telling the perpetrator to run or face consequences. After all, unless you're a deadshot, the odds of a perfect headshot are slim. Shouldn't the first priority be to save the victim while also protecting yourself?
I didn't understand the question at all.
I see it as a battle of ego. Just bend enough to match the interviewer's expectations and boom—you earn yourself points for clownery.
So how much did you lie in your interview?
You can make a UPSC aspirant do anything, just don't make them study.
Bruh, starting with pirated material is how at least 80% of aspirants begin, and then we talk about honesty.
Beta, first look into your own lap and see.
I always say and believe that Indians are getting what they deserve. The few honest ones may die, but they become just collateral damage in the bigger picture.
Aaj tak aisa kabhi hua hi nahi, sirf filmon ke alawa... aap manushya nahi, aap rattu chattu ho.